Hi again ,
I said they are fast and good performers , but its quite ironic to put it as faster chips than a64's ????!
Yes they are good performers , but ouch .... its not faster than p4's or a64's . 2 mb l2 cache does not mean that they will be fast , the more the cache side , the more the latency is , no matter how dense the memory is , thats why athlons does not keep 2mb's in their top of the line fx processors ,
Now ,
Forget A64's ... talk about Intel's , how much performance difference do you see with the 1mb cache EE's and 2 mb EE's ? Did you see that the 1mb EE 's are faster in the more cache intensive applications ?
Its preety simple , GHZ and MHZ myth has long gone , Its preety clear than nowadays the Processors are designed specifically for the perticular needs or the kind of enviroment they should be working in .The Centrino are supposed to work with Business applications , where it DOES perform , but below A64's .
Again , take the example of an Intel Itanium processor , 5 MB of Cache , Does that mean , that its going to perform as good as Desktop PC's in gaming ? Sun Sparc processors have 16 MB's of cache ( not on DIE )
They are supposed to work in a clustered enviroment , where a common application is supposed to work over hundereds of processors in a Clustered Node enviroment .
Its the balance of the features which u need in a processor , thats the reason why Centrino rules the mobile market and the A64s rule in the Desktops.