What is the actual capacity of 4.7 GB labeled DVD?
- Status
thats cuz hard disk manufacturers rate accroding to 1000kb=1mb and 1000mb= 1gb
where as when windows calculates it does it accurately at 1024kb=1mb and 1024mb=1gb
legolas i think u should've know that by now judging by the caliber of questions uve been askin
anyways no harm done .. better sooner than later
as for the dvd, maybe its the same concept if the above calculation fits
where as when windows calculates it does it accurately at 1024kb=1mb and 1024mb=1gb
legolas i think u should've know that by now judging by the caliber of questions uve been askin
anyways no harm done .. better sooner than later
as for the dvd, maybe its the same concept if the above calculation fits
theraven said:
Theraven the main reason is that 80 g.b hard disk has only 74.5 g.b because :
If you investigate your storage needs, you can tune some of global NTFS parameters to achieve significant increase of disk performance. Other techniques like disk defragmentation could help you either.
There are several factors (we do not mention here drive type, rpm ...) that affect the NTFS Performance: Cluster Size, location and fragmentation of Master File Table (MFT) and paging file, NTFS Volume compression, NTFS Volume Source (created or converted from existing FAT volume).
Define Cluster Size Properly
Cluster is an allocation unit. If you create file lets say 1 byte in size, at least one cluster should be allocated on FAT file system. On NTFS if file is small enough, it can be stored in MFT record itself without using additional clusters. When file grows beyond the cluster boundary, another cluster is allocated. It means that the bigger the cluster size, the more disk space is wasted, however, the performance is better.
The following table shows the default values that Windows NT/2000/XP uses for NTFS formatting:
Drive size
(logical volume) Cluster size Sectors
----------------------------------------------------------
512 MB or less 512 bytes 1
513 MB - 1,024 MB (1 GB) 1,024 bytes (1 KB) 2
1,025 MB - 2,048 MB (2 GB) 2,048 bytes (2 KB) 4
2,049 MB and larger 4,096 bytes (4 KB) 8
However, when you format the partition manually, you can specify cluster size 512 bytes, 1 KB, 2 KB, 4 KB, 8 KB, 16 KB, 32 KB, 64 KB in the format dialog box or as a parameter to the command line FORMAT utility.
What it gives us? Determine average file size and format the partition accordingly. How to determine? The simplest (but rough) way is to divide number of files on the drive by total disk usage in kilobytes. Another way is to just think about data you are going to store on the drive before formatting. If you are going to store multimedia stuff that is usually huge in size, make cluster bigger to increase a performance. If small web pages or text documents, make cluster size smaller not to loose a lot of disk space. Think!
Note: On Volumes, having cluster size more than 4 KB compression is not supported
MFT Reservation and Fragmentation
MFT contains frequently used system files and indexes, so performance of MFT affects a lot to the entire volume performance.
By default NTFS reserves zone, 12.5% of volume size for MFT and does not allow writing there any user's data, which lets MFT to grow. However, when, for example, a lot of files are placed to the drive, MFT can grow beyond the reserved zone and becomes fragmented. Another reason is when you delete file, NTFS does not always use its space in MFT to store new one, it just marks MFT entry as deleted and allocates new entry for the new file. It provides some performance and recovery benefits, however it forces MFT to be fragmented.
The more MFT fragmentation, the more the HDD heads movements to access the data, the less overall performance of file system.
Starting from Windows NT 4.0 SP4 you can define MFT Zone Reservation value through the Registry.
Key: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\FileSystem
Value NtfsMftZoneReservation of DWORD type (1 to 4) allows you to specify MFT Zone for the newly created/formatted volumes(12.5 percent, 25 percent, 37.5 percent, 50 percent of NTFS volume accordingly)
File and Directory Fragmentation
Not only MFT but also other files and directories can be fragmented when drive becomes full and you perform lots of copying and deleting actions with files. It also slows down system performance, so using standard Defragmentation Tools regularly is advisable when you perform a lot of copy/move/delete operations on the volume. Starting from Windows 2000, Disk Defragmenter is a part of Operating System and you can find it in Computer Management console.
If you do not have such tools, you can try doing it manually. Just copy files and folders to another partition, leaving original one nearly empty, and then copy them back. This solution is less effective than using standard Defragmentation Toools, however, it could greatly improve the volume performance in case if your partition was heavily fragmented.
Note: It's not an acceptable solution if you have security/permissions setup on these files. While copying between partitions you'll loose this information.
To prevent directory fragmentation, just perform complete drive defragmentation before installing new applications or copying lots of files onto the volume.
Paging File Fragmentation
You cannot use standard Defragmentation Tools to defragment Paging File (PAGEFILE.SYS) because it's being constantly used by Operating System for virtual memory storage. However, you still can do it manually. Just change it's location to another drive (or decrease it's size to minimal value if you do not have another drive), re-boot machine, perform volume Defragmentation, and change parameters of Paging File back to the original state. That's it!
Compression on NTFS Volumes
Compression could save some space on your volume and could increase or decrease your overall performance depending on CPU speed, Volume Size, and Compressible Data. If you have fast CPU and relatively slow HDD, compression is recommended because compressed data takes less size on volume and will be read and decompressed in the memory much faster than reading the whole uncompressed block from the slow drive. The larger the volume (> 8Gb), the lesser its performance if compressed. And, for sure, there is no use of compressing the Volume or folder containing uncompressible data, such as JPG images, ZIP files, etc... Ideal data for the compression are text and office documents, bitmap images and other files consisting of lots of repeating characters.
To compress the file/folder/volume - just go to its properties in Windows Explorer and mark Compressed checkbox.
Conversion volume from FAT to NTFS
If you did not setup Windows on the newly created NTFS Volume, but converted volume from FAT to NTFS, usually it causes MFT fragmentation so generally converted partitions are much slower than the ones being originally created as NTFS. Defragmentation tools are in general unable to defragment MFT, however, you can try to backup the whole system, re-format the volume with proper cluster size, and restore it back.
The Default Cluster Size for the NTFS and FAT File Systems (Q314878) :
*support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;EN-US;q314878
Keith Sebastian
Padawan
hafees said:
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=22751
Read my reply, carefully. I think it's from the Plextor site. A very simple explanation.
Keith
theraven said:thats cuz hard disk manufacturers rate accroding to 1000kb=1mb and 1000mb= 1gb
where as when windows calculates it does it accurately at 1024kb=1mb and 1024mb=1gb
legolas i think u should've know that by now judging by the caliber of questions uve been askin
anyways no harm done .. better sooner than later
as for the dvd, maybe its the same concept if the above calculation fits
If what you say is right then the DVD capacity should be 4.7 * 1000 =4700MB
But Nero just shows 4482 MB
rudra_chowdhury
Broken In
legolas said:yes, those buggers say it to be 4.7, but its seldom that rate... as u said, it arnd 4460-4480 only!
/legolas
160 GB = 160000000 bytes /1024 /1024 = 152.58 GB
After partitioning , it's effectively 149 Gb
For all hard disks, u roughly get 93% of the mentioned space.
For 200 GB, it is 186 GB .The 203 GB can be due to a disk geometry error originating from improper partioning.
rudra_chowdhury
Broken In
For a DVD +R DL 8.5GB something close to 7.9GB. Is this the maximum ? How much more with overburning ?
- Status