Pico & Pine

[firewall]

I am just wondering how many of us here still use Pico and specially Pine...

I use both.. still

 

[GNUrag]

I used pico and pine sometime back but dont use it now... both of these UW software are non-free software...

I use mutt and emacs .... I've binded emacs with mutt so all the mail composing is done by emacs. MUTT is as featureful (actually more !!!) as pine.

ps: many people love PICO, so there's also a pico clone called nano , its a free software and all the key bindings of pico are same and its interface and key shortcuts are almost the same...

 

[firewall]

yes... nano is also kool... ! but you know what, bad habits die hard

Mutt is rocking specially in case of using it with GPG

a.m

 

[pradeep_chauhan]

Its vi and pine for me. It my daily cup of coffee

 

[#/bin/sh]

i do.

 

[GNUrag]

mutt is GPL and better than PINE... I can mail my .muttrc file to anyone wishing to migrate to mutt. I am using familiar key bindings in muttrc so switching to mutt would not be a problem.

 

[nixcraft]

On most remote server pine is friend. Otherwise webmail always