Harddocp gave up, they could not find anything negative with those, even decreasing settings on 6970CFX could no make them catch up to 580 Lightning XE.
And after I dug a bit deeper:
When we compare MSI N580GTX Lightning XE 3GB SLI to Radeon HD 6970 CFX the water becomes more murky. There is over a $500 difference between these two setups. For $500 more, you get 1GB more of RAM per GPU with the MSI Lightning XE video cards, versus the HD 6970 video cards. While this was a big improvement over standard GTX 580's, it is less of an improvement over two 6970 video cards, which already have a good amount of RAM on them. For the most part, these two setups will perform very similar, except in some specific cases depending on the game. In F.E.A.R. 3 there was quite a big advantage with the MSI N580GTX Lightning XE 3GB SLI.
And again with the different setting thing:
DiRT 3 - MSI N580GTX Lightning XE 3GB SLI Video Card Review | [H]ard|OCP
This has been my point all along, they do not make the ati card win over nvidia, but they sure make it look like its very close.
Again same analogy, just opposite:
F1 2010 - MSI N580GTX Lightning XE 3GB SLI Video Card Review | [H]ard|OCP
Why didn't they increase AA on 6970cfx to 16x? Its giving 55FPs, so 16xaa should be playable?
Again:
Battlefield: Bad Company 2 - MSI N580GTX Lightning XE 3GB SLI Video Card Review | [H]ard|OCP
I want them to put apples to apple first.
Peace!!
press F3
I am here
Have another: Crysis: Warhead - MSI N580GTX Lightning XE 3GB SLI Video Card Review | [H]ard|OCP