I understand that the Sony Bravia X74K/X74L would be sufficient for me. The 65-inch TV would have done well. But I'm doubtful whether the TV can fit on the wall.
I thought the Samsung Frame TV had a better picture quality, more features and better design. It would be well spent for an additional 20k price. But I'm doubtful whether I can purchase the TV below Rs 70,000.
I was interested in the LG A2 55-inch TV while it was under sale. The Sales rep told me that entry-level LG OLEDs are not that great. I do not want to spend more than 100k for a better OLED TV.
Are the Samsung QN85C and QN90B FALD TVs? I saw their picture quality was even better. I was quoted Rs 90,000 for the QN85C and Rs 1,00,000 for the QN90B models. But again, the TVs would be an overkill for my usage.
My choice again comes down to Sony X74L vs Samsung the Frame. Why is a higher refresh rate, such as 100Hz, not better than the regular 50Hz on a TV apart from gaming?
I think the Frame TV is more similar to Q70C than Q60C. It also comes close to the Q80C. It means the Frame (2022) uses mini-LEDs. Here's the order from Samsung TVs:
QLED: Q60C (Entry-level), Q70C (Upper entry-level), The Frame (Upper entry-level), Q80C (Lower mid-range)
Neo QLED: QN85C (Mid-range), QN90C (Upper mid-range)