Another Slashdot latest:
"E-Week makes mention that GPL Version 3 is coming soon which will revise the GPL for the first time in a while."
An excerpt from the long discussions:
Read more here, and discuss the implications here
"E-Week makes mention that GPL Version 3 is coming soon which will revise the GPL for the first time in a while."
An excerpt from the long discussions:
jbn-o said:This latest revision of the GPL has almost nothing to do with "OSS" development. The open source movement (which doesn't like to talk about software freedom) did not exist when the current version of the GPL (version 2) was written. The free software movement (which is based on software freedom) predates the open source movement by over a decade. This upcoming version (version 3) of the GPL will be the first version of the GPL written since the open source movement started. As far as I know, nobody from the open source movement is writing the next revision of the GPL; it is still written by the people at the FSF (most notably, RMS and Eben Moglen, both of whom make it quite clear in their speeches that they are doing work to promote software freedom). So, the open source movement is receiving a great deal of credit for work it did not do and the danger of tying the GPL with the open source movement is that the open source movement's philosophy, which doesn't object to proprietary software, will be conflated with a license built to create and maintain a commons where software freedom is the rule.
Read more here, and discuss the implications here