Crysis 3

ithehappy

Human Spambot
Joined
Sep 23, 2010
Messages
3,746
Oh, now I know.
Vanilla version or whatever it's called it was good, but that HD and DX11 thing which made C2 a super one, in term of graphics I mean. I don't think if there was no external modifications the game would've reached the level what it have.
But be it Vanilla or not, the optimisation was just great.
 

gameranand

Living to Play
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
14,252
The point is, what game looked better than Crysis 2 on DX9? I cannot think of any.

Thats the point when C1 was Dx10 then why did they made C2 on Dx9. I mean its downgrading which is certainly not good. And do we even have to do this all over again, I think that we are finished over C2, NO. :)
 

cyborg47

Technomancer
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
2,828
Thats the point when C1 was Dx10 then why did they made C2 on Dx9. I mean its downgrading which is certainly not good. And do we even have to do this all over again, I think that we are finished over C2, NO. :)

I don't remember any of it, but yeah, downgrading was bad, i don't mean to say otherwise. But Crysis 2 was a damn good looking DX9 title to this day.
 

Nerevarine

Incarnate
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
8,567
Thats the point when C1 was Dx10 then why did they made C2 on Dx9. I mean its downgrading which is certainly not good. And do we even have to do this all over again, I think that we are finished over C2, NO. :)

Did you know assassin's creed 1 supported direct x 10 but the devs just never put in that extra effort to include directx10 in AC2, ACB and ACR
 

gameranand

Living to Play
Joined
Apr 26, 2008
Messages
14,252
Did you know assassin's creed 1 supported direct x 10 but the devs just never put in that extra effort to include directx10 in AC2, ACB and ACR

Damn....Alright lets just say that a game X is released which is a milestone for graphics in PC and have made a hell lot of fans and then X2 is released after 4 years, now what would you expect from X2, should it be better than X in every aspect be it graphically, gameplay or anything or not specially when developers said in their Interviews that X2 is going to be epic graphically and all for PC. Now comes the release of X2, its good on consoles considering their power but for PC its more of a Shitty game as compared to X with downgraded graphics, AI, a lot of bugs and what not. Then developers releases all the necessaries after 6 months. And mind you that most gamers would have already played and completed X2 by then apart from gamers like me who prefer to play the game when its development cycle is completed. Now what would you call X2 a very good game or a very bad game. In this case X is Crysis and X2 is Crysis 2. I hope you got my point and won't start it again. :)
 

cyborg47

Technomancer
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
2,828
Did you know assassin's creed 1 supported direct x 10 but the devs just never put in that extra effort to include directx10 in AC2, ACB and ACR

Where did you get that from? The devs only left out dx10 because they didn't see any kind of improvement in the game due to that. Moreover, AC2 on dx9 looked a lot more beautiful than AC1 did on dx10.

Damn....Alright lets just say that a game X is released which is a milestone for graphics in PC and have made a hell lot of fans and then X2 is released after 4 years, now what would you expect from X2, should it be better than X in every aspect be it graphically, gameplay or anything or not specially when developers said in their Interviews that X2 is going to be epic graphically and all for PC. Now comes the release of X2, its good on consoles considering their power but for PC its more of a Shitty game as compared to X with downgraded graphics, AI, a lot of bugs and what not. Then developers releases all the necessaries after 6 months. And mind you that most gamers would have already played and completed X2 by then apart from gamers like me who prefer to play the game when its development cycle is completed. Now what would you call X2 a very good game or a very bad game. In this case X is Crysis and X2 is Crysis 2. I hope you got my point and won't start it again. :)

An obvious smart move from Crytek which kinda backfired. On the brighter side, there's no single game that was set in New York and made it look as beautiful as it did in Crysis 2. Sure there were a lot of shameful downsides, but the scale, feel and environment of New York was captured perfectly. From an artistic standpoint, I'd rather go for a varied environment of Crysis 2, than a bland forest in Crysis 1, even though I admit I enjoyed the latter more :D
 

anirbandd

Conversation Architect
Joined
Oct 18, 2012
Messages
4,876
Damn....Alright lets just say that a game X is released which is a milestone for graphics in PC and have made a hell lot of fans and then X2 is released after 4 years, now what would you expect from X2, should it be better than X in every aspect be it graphically, gameplay or anything or not specially when developers said in their Interviews that X2 is going to be epic graphically and all for PC. Now comes the release of X2, its good on consoles considering their power but for PC its more of a Shitty game as compared to X with downgraded graphics, AI, a lot of bugs and what not. Then developers releases all the necessaries after 6 months. And mind you that most gamers would have already played and completed X2 by then apart from gamers like me who prefer to play the game when its development cycle is completed. Now what would you call X2 a very good game or a very bad game. In this case X is Crysis and X2 is Crysis 2. I hope you got my point and won't start it again. :)

where did you bring in the algebra?? :D

Where did you get that from? The devs only left out dx10 because they didn't see any kind of improvement in the game due to that. Moreover, AC2 on dx9 looked a lot more beautiful than AC1 did on dx10.

An obvious smart move from Crytek which kinda backfired. On the brighter side, there's no single game that was set in New York and made it look as beautiful as it did in Crysis 2. Sure there were a lot of shameful downsides, but the scale, feel and environment of New York was captured perfectly. From an artistic standpoint, I'd rather go for a varied environment of Crysis 2, than a bland forest in Crysis 1, even though I admit I enjoyed the latter more :D

level desingwas great. i'll agree on that.
 

Nerevarine

Incarnate
Joined
Feb 6, 2011
Messages
8,567
Damn....Alright lets just say that a game X is released which is a milestone for graphics in PC and have made a hell lot of fans and then X2 is released after 4 years, now what would you expect from X2, should it be better than X in every aspect be it graphically, gameplay or anything or not specially when developers said in their Interviews that X2 is going to be epic graphically and all for PC. Now comes the release of X2, its good on consoles considering their power but for PC its more of a Shitty game as compared to X with downgraded graphics, AI, a lot of bugs and what not. Then developers releases all the necessaries after 6 months. And mind you that most gamers would have already played and completed X2 by then apart from gamers like me who prefer to play the game when its development cycle is completed. Now what would you call X2 a very good game or a very bad game. In this case X is Crysis and X2 is Crysis 2. I hope you got my point and won't start it again. :)


too long did not read :p
im sleepy ;)
 

NVIDIAGeek

Long Live Gojira!
Joined
Nov 28, 2008
Messages
3,110
Dung just got very real. MP Open Beta starts 29th Jan.

I wants to know abouts Nomad tho.... :(
 

RCuber

The Mighty Unkel!!!
Staff member
Joined
Sep 7, 2004
Messages
7,108
for Beta keys -- Crysis 3 Beta Keys | AltTabMe

I got mine from a friend.
 
Top