Samsung M series

quicky008

Technomancer
I was watching a review video of the note 7 pro recently,couldn't help noticing that the colors on its display looked really rather dull and washed out.Does it have a regular TFT panel or an IPS lcd?

Is it true that amoled/superamoled screens tend to wear out faster than normal tft/ips displays due to screen burn-in issues?
 

billubakra

Conversation Architect
I was watching a review video of the note 7 pro recently,couldn't help noticing that the colors on its display looked really rather dull and washed out.Does it have a regular TFT panel or an IPS lcd?

Is it true that amoled/superamoled screens tend to wear out faster than regular displays due to screen burn-in issues?

About your second question, if they are from Samsung or LG then you can sleep without worrying.
 
I was watching a review video of the note 7 pro recently,couldn't help noticing that the colors on its display looked really rather dull and washed out.Does it have a regular TFT panel or an IPS lcd?

Is it true that amoled/superamoled screens tend to wear out faster than normal tft/ips displays due to screen burn-in issues?
I used an RN4 few years ago when I was using a Sony Z3C & I thought it was a good display. I don't think Xiaomi drastically reduced the quality of its IPS LCDs. If you are regularly using a phone with much superior display (especially AMOLED), RN7P should look not so good to you.

There was a Galaxy S2 in my home for almost 4 years & I didn't observe any burn in back then. But burn in was an issue Samsung was aware of that's why they were hesitant of implementing on-screen navigation buttons. AMOLEDs are much better now, especially ones from Samsung. LG is another big supplier.
 

SaiyanGoku

kamehameha!!
I'd give credit to Samdung for trying so hard and gotten so far. But in the end, it doesn't even matter. Xiaomi/Redmi bamboozled them again.
 
^can you specify some channels that upload sponsored vids? afaik there's one by the name of technical guruji (or some other such nonsense) who posts favourable reviews even for phones that dont deserve it-clearly,he does it for money.

How about others like c4etech,geekyranjit and so on?Are those guys trustworthy?Posting unboxing and review videos of popular handsets has clearly worked out very well for them,as is evidenced by their luxurious and opulent liftestyles(a couple of months back that ranjit fellow was flaunting a 4k samsung tv which he proudly proclaimed that he had purchased for 4 lakhs or thereabouts!).I think their lavish income results from the huge sponsorships they receive from phone manufacturers,as well as the revenue generated from youtube.
TECHNICAL GURUJI is not a reviewer. He never claims to be one. All he does is hands-on. He never says dont buy this or dont buy that.
 

Robert_Leo1

Right off the assembly line
The New M30 actually looks decent specs and pricing wise on my router login panel. Actually considering it as my next phone. Let's see what happens.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom