If we go by your "law of probability" then as time passes there will lesser leechers as well thus nullifying the effect on swarm speeds. Thus, the swarm speeds are ultimately effected by number of leechers/seeders only.
Also, what happened to the other point? Can you give any insights in...
lol!!!
you don't need to, cos you have no idea what you are talking about.
----------
Stop spreading the FUD man. BwT admins would never say anything so stupid. Show me a single comment where ANY BwT admin/mod says that they can control speed and I will retract every word I wrote...
Have a look here
*en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ReiserFS
...and especially read this line
Now even though that is dealing with smaller files but still ReiserFS gives better performance than ext3.
Because it is...
Nero is available as a demo download. You will need a key after sometime though (not sure after how many days)...
*www.nero.com/nero7/eng/nero7-up.php
This whole long paragraph you wrote just has one conclusion and it is that torrent speed depends on the number of seeders and peers and NOT THE DATE ON WHICH IT WAS CREATED. Seriously man, no matter what happens after 3 years the issue still depends on seeds:peers ratio and not date of creation...
Just so that you recollect, this is what you said
Now...
Why? How does date matter? Will a torrent with 10 as seeds:leech ratio created 2 years ago be slower than one having 0.5 or 1 ratio created yesterday? Why and how does date of creation effect torrent's health?
VBTT is just a frontend...
I have never heard of these two things effecting a torrent speed. Can you shed some light on it and the tracker software that provides the latter feature?
You can also try getting it from your local Linux User Group by posting about it on their mailing lists. You LUG seems to have this site.
*www.ilug-hyd.org.in/
Subscribe to their mailing list by going to "The Linux Community". Then write to them about CDs. Someone will probably send you...
Ever considered moving to reiserfs? You are seriously missing lots of performance by using ext3 instead of reiserfs.
Not just of Xine...
amaroK supports 7 backends and xine is just one of them. you should try amaroK with gstreamer instead of xine. you will get the best experience.
wow!!! this looks great and the best thing that i liked about it was in the screenshots. the fonts look absolutely amazing. they would give any windows install a run for its money.
check out the fonts and the rendering on this one
*shots.osdir.com/slideshows/485_or/10.png
Hi Guest we just wanted to alert you to a major change in the forum. We will no longer be allowing the posting of outgoing links. Please use the attachment feature to attach media to your posts.