divya magvani
Broken In
So wat r ur final opinion guyz i should pull d trigger for which one among dus 3 lenses
So wat r ur final opinion guyz i should pull d trigger for which one among dus 3 lenses
I told you these...some more advantages are55-200 is a flexible lens ...you can stand at the same place and shoot a headshot form 10 meters away ...
if using 50mm you will have to go near like 2 meters and shoot ....soo it depends ...if u are targetting street people or your own people
and 35mm will give u enough space to shoot full body shot which we indians mostly shoot ...50mm is good for half body
Thnx guys for ur help i ain't confused d problem is i want 2 do more than one type of photography my kit lens doesn't allow me to shoot zoomed images @f3.5 so cosidered either 35or50mm i,can zoom wid my feet and wanted to cover long range,macro to shoot insects flower,low light,birds,zoo animal i know my demand cant be completed by one single lens but it seemed u guys r well experienced dats y u guys can help otherwise to cover dis types ill need dedicated most expensive lens for macro 105micro,for shoulder head 85mm f1.4 for half body 50f1.4,wide28mm,35 f1.4,70-300 etc etc but one lens is my only budget since a ca student cant afford more dan 1 lens at tym so asked u guys whether which lens still dum muddled response dat i am confused nd all i agree with sujoy nd will try 55-200first den think bout buying it btw i have heard prime lens let you help develop as photographer since no zoom uhav to think bout composition is dat so btw again thnx for tremendous nd quick reply nd taking ur previous tym to respond to my query