Will Wii u meet the same fate of Sega Dreamcast

Will Wii u meet the same fate of Sega Dreamcast

  • Total voters
    13
Status
Not open for further replies.
NoasArcAngel

NoasArcAngel

Wise Old Owl
Extreme Gamer said:
1. Then what do you mean by Nintendoom? You're either speaking in Cryptic, or you're running around in circles.

2. Any reliable website will link to their sources and any other articles they may have taken data from.

3. I'm not contradicting myself. Rather, you're showing me an apparently less-than-perfect grasp of the English language.

Erm the PSP and the DS were first available between 10 days of each other. Dec 2 for DS and Dec 12 for PSP. I would say that their market share went down only if it was a gradual decline. Currently, it seems that in the handheld space Nintendo butt-raped Sony twice.



1. The first area they would target is the console for layoffs then, because the engineering department is always the most expensive.

2. You've changed the topic. You mention that internet news is unreliable/ half-baked. Now you say only nintendo fans read nintendo news.

3. And only indicated your apparently less-than-perfect grasp of english.
Click to expand...

1. -

2. -

3. Just read the para again.

Nintendoom will not happen in the foreseeable future because you can't foresee that far into the future

nintendo news, from nintendo sources.
 
H

heidi2521

Padawan
NoasArcAngel said:
1. when nintendo sales drop and the company is barely profitable

2. yes it is true. Gamers only interested in nintendo will know.

3. I have highlighted it, read again.
Click to expand...

1. By the same logic Sony was doomed at the PS3 launch. Plus, Nintendo sales are quite high right now.

2. You changed the topic. BTW, I don't think only gamers interested in Nintendo visit sites like IGN, Polygon, Destructoid, Eurogamer, rev3 and forums like /v/, /r/games, /r/gaming, neogaf, neoseeker, giant bomb etc.

3. "Nintendoom will not happen in the foreseeable future" does not contradict "10 years into the future is unforeseeable so we can't predict Nintendoom for that". Do point out the contradiction here.
 
Extreme Gamer

Extreme Gamer

僕はガンダム！
Vendor
NoasArcAngel said:
1. -

2. -

3. Just read the para again.

Nintendoom will not happen in the foreseeable future because you can't foresee that far into the future

nintendo news, from nintendo sources.
Click to expand...

What dead5 said:

dead5 said:
1. By the same logic Sony was doomed at the PS3 launch. Plus, Nintendo sales are quite high right now.

2. You changed the topic. BTW, I don't think only gamers interested in Nintendo visit sites like IGN, Polygon, Destructoid, Eurogamer, rev3 and forums like /v/, /r/games, /r/gaming, neogaf, neoseeker, giant bomb etc.

3. "Nintendoom will not happen in the foreseeable future" does not contradict "10 years into the future is unforeseeable so we can't predict Nintendoom for that". Do point out the contradiction here.
Click to expand...
 
NoasArcAngel

NoasArcAngel

Wise Old Owl
dead5 said:
1. By the same logic Sony was doomed at the PS3 launch. Plus, Nintendo sales are quite high right now.

2. You changed the topic. BTW, I don't think only gamers interested in Nintendo visit sites like IGN, Polygon, Destructoid, Eurogamer, rev3 and forums like /v/, /r/games, /r/gaming, neogaf, neoseeker, giant bomb etc.

3. "Nintendoom will not happen in the foreseeable future" does not contradict "10 years into the future is unforeseeable so we can't predict Nintendoom for that". Do point out the contradiction here.
Click to expand...

1. This is discussion is not about sony and the ps3.. stick to the topic please.

2. Stop being sarcastic, you can make your point without sarcasm also.

3. Extreme_Gamer edited his statement, i was pointing out to the original one

Extreme Gamer said:
Okay genius,

1. If Wii U meets Dreamcast's fate, it means that Nintendo stops making consoles...which will not happen even if Wii U does fail, which is the reason for mentioning the 3DS. Try to put 2 and 2 together sometimes.

2. Journalists care about company announcements, so even if a gamer does not watch Nintendo Direct, that does not mean he/she won't get to know about the announcement. For anything significant, there will be reports and articles across the internet.

3. Nintendoom will not happen in the foreseeable future. And it won't necessarily happen 10 years down the line because you can't foresee that far into the future. What's stopping the release of a new console or many awesome games for the existing console in the next many (6-7) years?
Click to expand...
 
Extreme Gamer

Extreme Gamer

僕はガンダム！
Vendor
NoasArcAngel said:
1. This is discussion is not about sony and the ps3.. stick to the topic please.

2. Stop being sarcastic, you can make your point without sarcasm also.

3. Extreme_Gamer edited his statement, i was pointing out to the original one
Click to expand...

1. He's making a point by using a relevant example.

2. No sarcasm there, lol.

3. You liar, I did not edit my post. Your quote is identical to what I posted == no contradiction.
 
Last edited:
NoasArcAngel

NoasArcAngel

Wise Old Owl
Extreme Gamer said:
1. He's making a point by using a relevant example.

2. No sarcasm there, lol.

3. You liar, I did not edit my post. Your quote is identical to what I posted.
Click to expand...

3. sorry about that, i was busy in the offtopic thread i misread it .

1. The thread is about nintendo, why bring sony. You want a SONY vs nintendo? dont think the mods doo

2. -

i misread that, he did not edit it

3. No I'm not. I said that they will not be doomed in the foreseeable future, and foreseeable future is ~1-5 years depending on the industry. For video games it is ~2 years. And 10 years is not foreseeable. What part of what I said do you not understand?
Click to expand...

thanks for pointing that out.
 
H

heidi2521

Padawan
NoasArcAngel said:
1. This is discussion is not about sony and the ps3.. stick to the topic please.

2. Stop being sarcastic, you can make your point without sarcasm also.

3. Extreme_Gamer edited his statement, i was pointing out to the original one
Click to expand...

1. I was just using the PS3 as a relevant example to point out that your logic is flawed.

2. I was not being sarcastic. Even if I was, sarcasm is allowed in this forum.

3. I'm sorry, but I don't see any sign that extreme gamer edited his post. Even if he did your quote and the current post are identical the meaning is still the same and I still see no contradiction.
 
NoasArcAngel

NoasArcAngel

Wise Old Owl
dead5 said:
1. I was just using the PS3 as a relevant example to point out that your logic is flawed.

2. I was not being sarcastic. Even if I was, sarcasm is allowed in this forum.

3. I'm sorry, but I don't see any sign that extreme gamer edited his post. Even if he did your quote and the current post are identical the meaning is still the same and I still see no contradiction.
Click to expand...

1. ps3 was never doomed in 2007. Check the financial stats for that year for SONY.

2. Sarcasm is being a smart ass is not
 
H

heidi2521

Padawan
NoasArcAngel said:
3. sorry about that, i was busy in the offtopic thread i misread it .

1. The thread is about nintendo, why bring sony. You want a SONY vs nintendo? dont think the mods doo

2. -

i misread that, he did not edit it



thanks for pointing that out.
Click to expand...

1. Nobody is making it a Sony vs. Nintendo thread. Using a Sony example does not make it a Sony vs. Nintendo thread.
 
Extreme Gamer

Extreme Gamer

僕はガンダム！
Vendor
NoasArcAngel said:
1. ps3 was never doomed in 2007. Check the financial stats for that year for SONY.

2. Sarcasm is being a smart ass is not
Click to expand...

1.*i.imgur.com/zYw1A.jpg

2. Why are you trying so hard to prove that you're english is less than satisfactory? Please rephrase that into grammatically correct syntax.
 
NoasArcAngel

NoasArcAngel

Wise Old Owl
Extreme Gamer said:
1.*i.imgur.com/zYw1A.jpg

2. Why are you trying so hard to prove that you're english is less than satisfactory? Please rephrase that into grammatically correct syntax.
Click to expand...

my english is perfectly fine. and i think you should use common sense to figure out what my reply means, the fact that you cannot understand it tells me about your level of english.

The ps3 went into design by 2005 and by that time SONY had a very good financial record. And when the ps3 launched in 2007, the 599$ pricetag.
 
Extreme Gamer

Extreme Gamer

僕はガンダム！
Vendor
NoasArcAngel said:
my english is perfectly fine. and i think you should use common sense to figure out what my reply means, the fact that you cannot understand it tells me about your level of english.

The ps3 went into design by 2005 and by that time SONY had a very good financial record. And when the ps3 launched in 2007, the 599$ pricetag.
Click to expand...

Now look who's contradicting himself :rolleyes:

ps3 was never doomed in 2007. Check the financial stats for that year for SONY.
Click to expand...
 
NoasArcAngel

NoasArcAngel

Wise Old Owl
look who's talking. :rolleyes: contradictions and your statements could make a thread together

and there is nothing wrong with that statement, even if I am to go by the stats you provided from god knows where. Sony put a staggering 1 billion pounds in the development of the ps3 not to mention first party studios and development of services like psn

Sony took a great risk with a great product and the effort paid off, unlike Nintendo sitting with billions in their banks and still not accepting Wiius fate.

sometimes we have to accept fate
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom