Hi Everyone,
I am planning on buying nikon d3200 or d3300.It will be my first dslr.I will be using the kit lens with them for like 2 years or so..not planning to upgrade in near future.
They are being offered at 23500 and 27000 at flipkart currently.
After reading about the 2 models I think these are the differences:
Smaller size of 3300
better video capture at 60 fps in 3300 as compared to 40 fps at 1080p in 3200
better speed processor 5 clicks as compared to 4 in 3200
better battery life - 200 more clicks in 3300
more options for picture like panorama mode in 3300
more pic editing features in 3300
But still 3200 is sold a lot more than 3300 ?
I think the image quality is same in both the cams... so is it worth spending 3.5k more on 3300 ?
I will be using it for family photography.. landscapes.. low light pics.. nothing extraordinary like the micro pics or something..
Which will be better ? Please suggest
I am planning on buying nikon d3200 or d3300.It will be my first dslr.I will be using the kit lens with them for like 2 years or so..not planning to upgrade in near future.
They are being offered at 23500 and 27000 at flipkart currently.
After reading about the 2 models I think these are the differences:
Smaller size of 3300
better video capture at 60 fps in 3300 as compared to 40 fps at 1080p in 3200
better speed processor 5 clicks as compared to 4 in 3200
better battery life - 200 more clicks in 3300
more options for picture like panorama mode in 3300
more pic editing features in 3300
But still 3200 is sold a lot more than 3300 ?
I think the image quality is same in both the cams... so is it worth spending 3.5k more on 3300 ?
I will be using it for family photography.. landscapes.. low light pics.. nothing extraordinary like the micro pics or something..
Which will be better ? Please suggest
