Which one is Better

Status
Not open for further replies.

drgrudge

Another Brick in the Wall
norton is a resource sucker, go for kaspersky( i myself installed on batty's advice). norton did not even detect some threats , and the same was detected by kaspersky.

use once and we all will tell kaspersky is good.
 
H

h4ck3r

Guest
Nothing is best

No anti virus is fully perfect...
1)Norton does not detect a virus embedded in a file(merged with another exe)
2)Mcafee does not detect at all(Stinger is an exception)
3)Zonealarm is prone to ack flooding and it can also be patched using runtime infection techniques8)
4)McAfee Firewall and tiny firewall are also of no use. :evil:
5)Norton Av can also be finsihed by using a program newly designed ..Dun wanna mention the name :wink:

So kasperksy can also be defeated in the mere future 8)
 

swatkat

Technomancer
Go for AVG 7 FREE Edition
*free.grisoft.com/freeweb.php/doc/2/lng/us/tpl/v5
OR
Computer Associates eTrust EZ AV,it's the BEST AV and it's highly resource efficient.
*www.my-etrust.com/
 
H

h4ck3r

Guest
You are right

I have to agree with you guyz coz avg does not allow you to access the infected file :lol:
 
H

h4ck3r

Guest
norton is junk

Sorry vysakh..Norton's real junk and resource sucking..Its good for nothing
 

atool

Journeyman
AVG it is...i hv tried norton, panda, kaspersky and antivir...but AVG is best..its light on system, its effective and its FREE..go for it
 

Aseem Nasnodkar

In the zone
AVG is ultimate!
N its free. It detects all minor viruses too which norton fails to detect. It is low on resources... fast 2 update!
Don't go 4 PC heal.......It gets all viruses bt dsn't have a virus vault
 
H

h4ck3r

Guest
I have to agree with you

I have never seen a devil like avg...
It ruins all my plans .. So nice that even a single trojan,variant,or a worm can't get past it.. Its free of cost .. It denies access to the infected phile.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom