Ok I am actually doing a heavy reading now on motherboard / chipset / etc...and first time i came to know that chipset and motherboard can be different. Actually out of hardware touch in last two years. now catching up with help of u guys.
One quick q though - Abit IP35 E uses Intel's P35 chipset the same found in DP35DP Board.
Then why get another motherboard from Abit rather than intel itself if they both use same chipset...???
Also see *en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_abit - ABit does not seem a reliable company
Now I got what u meant by Intel chipset Motherboards -- Motherboards of other companies with Intel chipset.
Which would be a good graphics card for rs 3000 to 4000 K...??
Boss i really want dual channel support (i have been using that for years and it makes RAM really fast)...
For normal movie watching and normal games - just in case - how much diff a graphics card makes...
# which is Intel's best Chipset and on which motherboard for Core 2 Quad...?
When Intel and another company both make motherboards with the same chipset, non intel made is prefered mainly because intel motherboards prevent overclocking. And they have NO customisations by default.
Abit is actually a good company. They were once unstoppable, then faded away, and recently returned back in style with the awssome IP35-E for mainstream and IP35-Pro for overclockers. But as per the latest reviews, they are again going behind, with Biostar, ASUS and MSI enterning the limelight for P45 chipset based boards.
A good 3k to 4k GPU would be 8600GT now, but I would advice you to wait and see what the 9500GT comes down to.
With 800MHz RAM, dual channel is going to give only 5% speed boost, and perhaps 10-15% when gaming. This is too trivial since the 800MHz RAMs are good enough for all tasks.
A Graphic Card will help hugely by taking-off load of your CPU. You need Graphics Card to watch High-Def. content. Get a NVIDIA 8600GT for around 3.2k. Kingston 2GB DDR2 800MHz RAM (2x1GB). Abit is a good and reputed company. Quad Core is good for you. 630i chipset by NVIDIA is good for you. Wikipedia runs on user-submitted content and that means, dumb users and can post too. Hope, this clarifies it.
Actually, you NEED a graphics card (onboard or otherwise) if you want to see more than 8 colours on your monitor. For this, even onboard graphics will do. But the real help in things like video decoding depends on the card you are using.While most intel onboards like GMA 3100 which is found in Q35 and G31 motherboards suck, and can't play HD content and can't be used for low end gaming, onboards from nVidia and ATI rock. ATI Radeon HD1200, HD1250, HD3100, HD3200 and HD3300 rock and beat intel everywhere. nVidia GeForce 7050, 7100, 7150, 8100, 8200 and 8300 also rock as onboard graphics solutions. But ofcource, you should only be intrested in HD3xxx series and GF8xxx series if you need an onboard system that can actually play some GAMES as in Crysis, BioShock, etc, even though at low settings.
And even in dedicated graphics cards, the thing that makes lots of difference is the card itself. 7100GS won't offer any speed boosts over most onboard solutions, and is nothing more than a basic video processor. You need to think atleast as high as 8600GT or HD3650 if you need something which can play all games.
Any card from GeForce 8100 and above and Radeon HD3100 and above are capable of handling HD video decoding in MPEG, H.264 and VC-I formats. Lower end ones can't do it and hence your CPU is still taxed slightly.
There is no difference otherwise between an onboard card and a dedicated card in performance. Memory for onboard cards is often "shared", meaning used from the system RAM, while dedicated cards usually posess their own memory. Performance depends not on the place the card is installed (onboard or dedicated) but on its model.