Do You Agree With Sc Decision ?
- Status
Siddharth Maheshwari
In the zone
In my opinion improvement is the correct punishment.
Instead of hanging the sc should have given an order in which the corrupted should be forced to do some work which may have put them in shame and they will leave corruption.
In the next time they can be given life term but not hanging.
If he is hanged then think what will go on his family.They had done no wrong thing.
Instead of hanging the sc should have given an order in which the corrupted should be forced to do some work which may have put them in shame and they will leave corruption.
In the next time they can be given life term but not hanging.
If he is hanged then think what will go on his family.They had done no wrong thing.
freebird
Debian Rocks!
In my personal opinion not only corruption regional biased politicians do deserve some punishment.yes i am talking about Laaluji only.past railway budget he alloted more than 5000 karod rupees for Bihar! and Our Asst.MInister from Tamil Nadu Mr.Veloo too did a very gr9 thing-he too alloted big money for his state!-and a Railway Division for a small town near Bangalore City -Salem;dividing already profitably running palekkad division.
Why only corruption and bribery do SC notices?these sort of regional bias that these ministers do are something unacceptable.remember some states like Kerela dont even got a Naya Paise alloted with Railway Budget although Keralites take tickets while travelling.
Why only corruption and bribery do SC notices?these sort of regional bias that these ministers do are something unacceptable.remember some states like Kerela dont even got a Naya Paise alloted with Railway Budget although Keralites take tickets while travelling.
Aberforth
The Internationalist
Hanging could create a huge problems, if you want an official killed, you can use tricks to frame them and get hanged. The goons will have an easier way to eliminate honest officials and the corrupt ones will always find ways to circumvent the law. Corrupt officials will float money like water to save their life. Risky proposal, very risky - the country will go to the dogs.
T
thunderbird.117
Guest
Aberforth said:
Very true.
azaad_shri75
BE FREE
all corrupt people should be shot on the spot.
deepak.krishnan
In the zone
Well if we start shooting the corrupt officers then there wont be much politicians and Govt. officers left in our country!!!
eddie
El mooooo
Decision? It was not a decision...just a statement my dear friend. There is a huge difference between the two. A SC decision of such a nature would become binding on all the courts in India making it almost like a law. On the other hand a statement is just an observation that the Hon'ble Judge made.mandar5 said:
BTW I do agree that a few corrupt people need to be made example of...not all but definitely a few.
NucleusKore
TheSaint
Draconian measures never work
mAV3 said:
I think it will be more like 1/2 of india...
As for your question, "what then":
Population decreases, we will go from 1.1 billion to 550 million, we can educate the remaining, feed them well, clothe them, people will be able to afford housing, traffic jams will disappear, jobs will pay better, pollution will decrease, everyone gets richer, no one needs to take bribes, because of the increase in educated indians we will have a better economy, more skill and will overtake the US as the world's biggest super power... now is that really a bad thing? I say send all the corrupt people to one state, and nuke it... saves money... one nuke MUST be cheaper than 550 million ropes and funerals!
Raaabo
shantanu
Technomancer
In my opinion The correct thing is just to hang them till death, No matter what ,it been seen from years that corruption never pays, see some examples of the ministers , they do every type of corruption and then they go clean chit, what happens, after all who suffers is the poor and common man,
SO guilty should be given proper treatment..
SO guilty should be given proper treatment..
Aberforth
The Internationalist
shantanu_webmaster said:
Well they get clean chit because they are not convicted, they have the money and power to avoid punishment which again means even if death sentence existed, they would have got clean chit. And if death is the punishment, they would be even more motivated to make sure they get clean chit whatever it takes at the expense of leeched tax money. Which ends in loss for the common man and a drag in resources.
T
thunderbird.117
Guest
Raaabo said:
I agree.
blademast3r
In the zone
they shud not be hanged...oh nomandar5 said:
they shud be given a slow painful death...
freshseasons
King of my own Castle
I dont think they Have decided it. Its just that the judge said the if he had the authority he had rather hang all the corrupt people as all of the people here are after the country to loot it.mandar5 said:
It think you mis interpreted the news. Intention is not writ petition or law. It was a statement from a judge about hwat he had do if he had free hand.
I dont think such decision has ever come on modern time.
- Status