deathvirus_me said:Isn't it obvious ??? the later has 800 MHz FSB ... .. otherwise there is nothing much different in them ... the later one will give u slightly better performance ..
sam9s said:No later one would not give you better performance, unless you have the RAM to utilise it. FSB is the speed that the CPU communicates with RAM (memory). Higher FSB only increases performance when you push your RAM to fully utilises it.
FSB is always Quad Pumped the actual Bus speed. Like if your processor supports 800 FSB its actual bus speed is 200*4(Quad pumped). This means in a layman tearms that you can run your memory to a max of 800 mhz, though it also depends upon the FSB/Mem ratio you set in the BIOS.
For ramu if you are running your memory to default 533, it makes no difference if you have 533FSB or 800FSB, you will feel no difference.
sam9s said:No later one would not give you better performance, unless you have the RAM to utilise it. FSB is the speed that the CPU communicates with RAM (memory). Higher FSB only increases performance when you push your RAM to fully utilises it.
FSB is always Quad Pumped the actual Bus speed. Like if your processor supports 800 FSB its actual bus speed is 200*4(Quad pumped). This means in layman tearms that you can run your memory to a max of 800 mhz, though it also depends upon the FSB/Mem ratio you set in the BIOS.
For ramu if you are running your memory to default 533, it makes no difference if you have 533FSB or 800FSB, you will feel no difference.
deathvirus_me said:No matter how cool it sound .. the actual performance diff. is hardly noticeable,, ,
deathvirus_me said:Well , ur not .. but that diff. in FSB is only on papers , in actual real time performance it hardly matters ...