chimera201
Wise Old Owl
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
Reviews are out.
Great workstation performance.
Not so great gaming performance.
Reviews are out.
Great workstation performance.
Not so great gaming performance.
AMD Ryzen thread
chimera201
Wise Old Owl
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
XFR is more or less useless for India.
XFR is more or less useless for India.
ZTR
Cyborg Agent
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170302/3804a2b084ba78b4117930c2565d9822.jpg
Ryzen 1700 vs i7 7700K REVIEW | Best CPU Under $350? - YouTub
Could be because of bios, firmware issues because that result is great
Sent from my Redmi Note 3
Gaming seems to be variable as Joker got his 1700 @3.9Ghz match 7700k @5 GHz
*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170302/3804a2b084ba78b4117930c2565d9822.jpg
Ryzen 1700 vs i7 7700K REVIEW | Best CPU Under $350? - YouTub
Could be because of bios, firmware issues because that result is great
Sent from my Redmi Note 3
OP
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
Not buying into "4 cores are enough" in 2016.
Gaming performance leaves much to be desired, but what I want to see is how new games will perform.
Otherwise a great chip. Very power efficient, and better than i7-6900K [8 cores] in many benchmarks.
Not buying into "4 cores are enough" in 2016.
Gaming performance leaves much to be desired, but what I want to see is how new games will perform.
Otherwise a great chip. Very power efficient, and better than i7-6900K [8 cores] in many benchmarks.
bssunilreddy
Chosen of the Omnissiah
Ryzen not yet optimised for all kinds of software as it needs time to mature. Then we can think of changing the chipset.
Until then Kabylake is the way to go.
Number of cores are more than Intel but there aren't many applications or games that use multiple cores.
What is the main problem with AMD GPUs are they don't offer what Nvidia is offering.
But AMD CPU or GPU support with better drivers for a long term than Intel or Nvidia.
Sent from my Lenovo K6 Power using Tapatalk
Until then Kabylake is the way to go.
Number of cores are more than Intel but there aren't many applications or games that use multiple cores.
What is the main problem with AMD GPUs are they don't offer what Nvidia is offering.
But AMD CPU or GPU support with better drivers for a long term than Intel or Nvidia.
Sent from my Lenovo K6 Power using Tapatalk
chimera201
Wise Old Owl
Since it's a new architecture some microcode optimization might be needed. Hopefully that happens before the release of R5.
i5 vs R5 should be interesting.
That has been said since the release of the FX lineup. By the time games do actually use multiple cores efficiently, Intel would have released CPUs with more cores.
i5 vs R5 should be interesting.
That has been said since the release of the FX lineup. By the time games do actually use multiple cores efficiently, Intel would have released CPUs with more cores.
ZTR
Cyborg Agent
BF1 already does
Just see this *uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20170303/92406468c93f2607ffe41eb21c24010a.jpg
Sent from my Redmi Note 3
No,This was true 2 years ago but now most games make use of multiple cores also Ryzen is more efficient than Intel anyway and cheaper too so there no reason not to go with Ryzen.
chimera201
Wise Old Owl
Is that really efficient though? Just distributing the tasks and having around 50% utilization isn't optimization. It actually says that it doesn't need more cores. And i7 has the better minimum and average framerates. Besides i would like to see a game that hasn't partnered with hardware companies making use of multiple cores say games like Dark Souls III. That would be something.
*www.techspot.com/articles-info/1345/bench/Battlefield.png
mobo
Broken In
We have been saying for the past 5 years how dual cores are useless but the dual cores on steroids still manage to muscle ahead of vegan quad cores. Games don't really require an i7 unless they perform twice as fast on 4C/8T compared to 2C/4T.
Processors and OSes are designed to distribute load on multiple cores, and even a single thread will actually be running on all 8 cores of an octa core, albiet at a much lower load per core.
Game developers are smart enough to not alienate the mainstream of 4T or 4C gamers by making 8T a necessity, but if Ryzens are affordable then I guess the future is indeed multi-threaded.
Hail Ryzen!
Processors and OSes are designed to distribute load on multiple cores, and even a single thread will actually be running on all 8 cores of an octa core, albiet at a much lower load per core.
Game developers are smart enough to not alienate the mainstream of 4T or 4C gamers by making 8T a necessity, but if Ryzens are affordable then I guess the future is indeed multi-threaded.
Hail Ryzen!
baccilus
Cyborg Agent
Consoles have 8 cores now. So the core utilization situation will change a lot faster this time.
chimera201
Wise Old Owl
The PS3 had a special processor that was multi-core(1 PPE and 8 SPEs)
chimera201
Wise Old Owl
Anomaly
*media.bestofmicro.com/ext/aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS8wLzEvNjU5NjY1L29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDQ4LnBuZw==/r_600x450.png
*media.bestofmicro.com/ext/aHR0cDovL21lZGlhLmJlc3RvZm1pY3JvLmNvbS8wLzEvNjU5NjY1L29yaWdpbmFsL2ltYWdlMDQ4LnBuZw==/r_600x450.png
billubakra
Conversation Architect
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
Man I was planning to go for it for a gaming pc
Man I was planning to go for it for a gaming pc
chimera201
Wise Old Owl
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
Not so great doesn't mean bad lol. But wait for R5.
Man I was planning to go for it for a gaming pc
Not so great doesn't mean bad lol. But wait for R5.
Re: Will AMD Ryzen live up to the hype?
Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk
So i heard that R5 is releasing on April 11..?
Sent from my SM-N930F using Tapatalk